[consulting] Is this list dead?

[Victor Kane]

On 3/20/07, Kieran Lal <kieran at civicspacelabs.org> wrote:
>
>
> Most of IBM's profits in the $90 Billion+ in revenue come from their
> proprietary software.  There are no plans to stop being one of the largest
> proprietary software vendors, and most profitable profitable software
> vendors.
>

absolutely, you are correct here: I simply meant (mainly for the reasons you
describe very clearly below) that even they are taking advantage of the open
source business model.

  Among the reasons they support open source are:
>
> 1) In industries they had lost, e.g. windows, open source would allow them
> to complete a solution stack, with linux, for their customers with ensuring
> their competitors did not have lock in control over IBM's customers.
>
> 2) IBM's profitable solutions failed to attract talent the way Oracle
> lured DBAs, and Microsoft lured programmers.  In order for IBM to compete
> they needed the talent to work on and support their solutions, and embracing
> open source was an effective talent rallying cry.
>
> 3) IBM's unique support of hundreds, if not thousands of hardware systems
> meant the costs of maintaining compatibility across these systems was too
> great to be profitable and supported.  Open source, was open and was
> architected to  be platform agnostic which meant IBM could reduce their
> platform costs by phasing out proprietary OSes, and supporting mostly Linux
> and Windows as their customers wanted.
>
> The lessons to take away are: Can you fend off your competitors by
> reducing the competitive advantage to the cost of deployment? Can you
> acquire the talent you need to grow your business? Can you ensure you are
> not constrained by any one platform?
>
> Open sourcing your code give these three advantages.
>
> Kieran
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/consulting/attachments/20070320/9230dc94/attachment.htm