No!<br>What we want in the Drupal CVS is modules that have made people financially successful! Not a dustbin for failures.<br><br>I do understand that there is no negative correlation whatsoever between business failure and quality of code. But there certainly is a positive correlation going in the other direction.
<br><br>That is why the model needs to be discussed.<br><br>My two cents worth, anyway,<br><br>Victor Kane<br><a href="http://awebfactory.com.ar">http://awebfactory.com.ar</a><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/20/07,
<b class="gmail_sendername">Morbus Iff</b> <<a href="mailto:morbus@disobey.com">morbus@disobey.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> I've never understood why these things are always discussed as one or<br>> the other. I personally like the clause in a business plan "We will be<br>> releasing an open-source version after x # of new users joins" or
<br>> "after x number of $" Obviously, abide by the law if you plan on doing<br>> that, whatever applies in your case.<br><br>/me nods. I've already decided that should It Fail or be Financially<br>Unsustainable, then the code would be dropped into the Drupal CVS.
<br><br>--<br>Morbus Iff ( hey britney, you say you want to lose control? )<br>Technical: <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779">http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779</a><br>Culture: <a href="http://www.disobey.com/">
http://www.disobey.com/</a> and <a href="http://www.gamegrene.com/">http://www.gamegrene.com/</a><br>aim: akaMorbus / skype: morbusiff / icq: 2927491 / <a href="http://jabber.org">jabber.org</a>: morbus<br>_______________________________________________
<br>consulting mailing list<br><a href="mailto:consulting@drupal.org">consulting@drupal.org</a><br><a href="http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting">http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting</a><br></blockquote>
</div><br>