I'm going to patent this thread.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:07 PM, Liam McDermott <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:liam@intermedia-online.com">liam@intermedia-online.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d">Larry Garfield wrote:<br>
> GPLv3 has a patent protection clause. GPLv2 does not.<br>
<br>
</div>This is not entirely true, search for the word 'patent' in the GPL 2<br>
text at: <a href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt" target="_blank">http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.txt</a><br>
<br>
The OP's assertion is probably incorrect, but to say there is no patent<br>
clause is equally incorrect. Of course, the use of the clause and what<br>
it does is another argument (and would no doubt, require a lawyer). :)<br>
<br>
Kind Regards,<br>
<font color="#888888">Liam McDermott.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c">consulting mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:consulting@drupal.org">consulting@drupal.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting" target="_blank">http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>David Jones<br>Reverb, LLC / 303-817-7942 / <a href="mailto:david@web-reverb.com">david@web-reverb.com</a><br>