To address the concern re: clients seeing your list discussions: you could choose to use a more discreet username on g.d.o, one that your clients wouldn't (easily) find.<div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div><br></div>
<div>--D<br clear="all">--<br>D202 - People-Centric Websites<br>646.536.7502 || Office<div>New York -- Miami -- Worldwide<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Shai Gluskin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:shai@content2zero.com">shai@content2zero.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br style="border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote">Ron wrote:<br><br><blockquote><blockquote style="border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex" class="gmail_quote">
Why not both? </blockquote><div><br></div></blockquote><div>It makes the community more diffuse. It would cause people to have to monitor two different things, adding to digital clutter.<br><br>The question is, "Why both?"<br>
<br>Sam suggested that the list serve is a little bit more private than a g.d.o group. So far, no one else has supported that reasoning, advocating instead that transparency is more important than privacy. And indeed, this list's archive is exposed to Google anyway, suggesting that any felt privacy is not real anyway.<br>
<br>Are there any other reasons any of you can think of to advocate for a continued list serve (presuming that the new g.d.o. will give us full email following and posting capabilities)?<br><br>Shai<br></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
consulting mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:consulting@drupal.org">consulting@drupal.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting" target="_blank">http://lists.drupal.org/mailman/listinfo/consulting</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>