<font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">for <i>the public record</i>, I'm loving this version of this [meta] discussion of the purpose of the list, the recurrence of which many of us have </font></font><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif">certainly</font></font><font size="2"><font face="verdana,sans-serif"> come to expect... it demonstrates how the list is evolving, that many are weary of the bickering (and/or that the most sensitive & control-minded folk have left), and Jeff opened it up with some great observations.<br>
<br>I wear a lot of different hats, so my personal take is that I rather like that the list acts as a pretty wide bucket. I think "consultant" itself is a rather loosely-defined term for many of us, and for me that's just fine.<br>
<br clear="all"></font></font><span style="color: black;"><div dir="ltr"><div><font color="#666666"><font face="verdana, sans-serif">--<br>matt j. sorenson<br>320-424-0309</font></font></div></div></span><br>