[development] 4.7 status: Call for patch reviews

[Derek Wright]

On Nov 14, 2006, at 3:17 AM, Gerhard Killesreiter wrote:

> 1a) if it does, move it there (I am not sure whether it needs to by  
> x.y.z, 5-dev, or 6-dev..., IMO there are two choices too many).

mea culpa.  to clarify:

- never classify anything to the x.y.z version.  only move things out  
of x.y.z (so named to drive how how silly and useless this  
classification system was).  see my other email re "Confusion by too  
many issue queues" for more on this.

- anything that is relevant for 5.x (e.g. current HEAD) goes in 5.x- 
dev (should be self-evident)

- anything that is a feature request or too big of a change for 5.0  
should be bumped to the 6.x-dev queue (should also be self-evident).

thanks,
-derek