Holy cow.<br><br>Sanity.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 4/21/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jonathan Chaffer</b> <<a href="mailto:jchaffer@structureinteractive.com">jchaffer@structureinteractive.com</a>> wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Apr 21, 2006, at 8:11 AM, Bčr Kessels wrote:<br><br>> CCK is NOT ready. There are NO working upgrade paths and people DO use
<br>> flexinode a lot.<br>> I beleive CCK is the way to go, for sure. But if we drop flexinode<br>> now, we<br>> have NOTHING for a long time. meaning that we force thousands of<br>> sites to<br>> remain on
4.6.<br>><br>> Hence, i will maintain flexinode, if only for my own sites.<br><br>Here's the official stance from CCK's mainainer. :-)<br><br>- CCK will be ready for 4.7's release. For some values of "ready."
<br>That is, I have been launching production sites using it for some<br>time, and I feel that it's stable.<br>- It will probably be a couple months yet before all of Flexinode's<br>features are implemented in CCK, so people who need those should stay
<br>with Flexinode.<br>- An upgrade path from Flexinode to CCK is critical. Owen is working<br>on this.<br>- I am very very very happy that Bčr is stepping up and maintaining<br>Flexinode as I throw my efforts elsewhere. The two can coexist very
<br>nicely during the 4.7 cycle.<br><br>--<br>Jonathan Chaffer<br>Algorithm Alchemist, Structure Interactive<br>(616) 364-7423 <a href="http://www.structureinteractive.com/">http://www.structureinteractive.com/</a><br>
<br><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>