<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 5/16/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jeff Eaton</b> <<a href="mailto:jeff@viapositiva.net">jeff@viapositiva.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> -----Original Message-----<br>> From: Boris Mann [mailto:<a href="mailto:boris@bryght.com">boris@bryght.com</a>]<br>><br>> > voting api<br>><br>> Neutral. Good functionality<br><br>I'd say -1 on VotingAPI. The modules built on top of it may be essential
<br>for certain kinds of sites -- community and portal sites for example --<br>but it's too heavy to shove into core given how many people just don't<br>need what it offers. It belongs in a broader class of 'API modules,' I
<br>think.</blockquote><div><br>These weren't "should it be in core" ratings, but rather, are these "premium" modules.<br> </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
In particular, its integration with views and actions is still in flux,<br>and needs a lot more development before it's 'fully baked.'</blockquote><div><br>Yep...which I didn't explicitly state, but that was what took the +1 to neutral (today).
<br></div></div><br>-- <br>Boris Mann<br>Vancouver 778-896-2747<br>San Francisco 415-367-3595<br>Skype borismann<br><a href="http://www.bryght.com">http://www.bryght.com</a>