<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; "><DIV><DIV>On 30.May.2006, at 02:02, Jonathan Lambert wrote:</DIV><BR class="Apple-interchange-newline"><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><SPAN class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: separate; border-spacing: 0px 0px; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-align: auto; -khtml-text-decorations-in-effect: none; text-indent: 0px; -apple-text-size-adjust: auto; text-transform: none; orphans: 2; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; "><FONT face="Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN style="font-size:12.0px; font-family: Verdana; "><SPAN class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Verdana; ">But, I disagree with you about the severity of the problem of unsupported older versions.</SPAN></SPAN></FONT></SPAN></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR><DIV>I just want to make the observation that you are confusing support of Drupal the product with suppport of users. They are not one and the same. </DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>As I said before, Drupal developers can choose not to work on old code. The issue is how to make it easy and cost-efficient for users to upgrade and ride the wave of innovation. </DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>Cheers, </DIV><DIV>liza</DIV></BODY></HTML>