<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; "><BR><DIV><DIV>On 28-Jul-06, at 9:05 AM, Jeff Eaton wrote:</DIV><BR class="Apple-interchange-newline"><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"> <DIV><FONT face="Verdana" size="2"><SPAN class="218230216-28072006">I'm not sure that's an accurate characterization. SysCrusher hasn't had a chance to work on the administrative screen for bulk link maint. work, but the module has been good to go under 4.7 for months now. It has a robust API, very solid views integration, and is easy to integrate with. The biggest problem is that 1) its description has an outdated warning, and 2) it hasn't been officially branched. That latter problem is definitely a big one, but I'd really suggest anyone considering implementing a links management system consider links.module and links.inc as their starting point.</SPAN></FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Verdana" size="2"><SPAN class="218230216-28072006"></SPAN></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face="Verdana" size="2"><SPAN class="218230216-28072006">Obviously, some would prefer a smaller focused all in one solution. :) No problem with that. But the links package itself is definitely not in disrepair.</SPAN></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></DIV><DIV>Would neglected be a better word? 1 & 2 as you mention above are indicators to me that not enough attention is being paid to the bundle (I'm not trying to diss links, just trying to find out more about future direction / viability).</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>And yes, the other big thing is the does-it-all nature...</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>-- Boris</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV></BODY></HTML>