You are right, URNs suit this problem a lot better than URI-style strings.<br><br>For all of you who want to test that: If you have iTunes installed, type "itms:" into your browser's adress bar and hit return.<br>
<br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2006/8/5, Morbus Iff <<a href="mailto:morbus@disobey.com">morbus@disobey.com</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
>> I prefer the idea of internal:// over Drupal.<br>>><br>>> +1 from me also, for reasons others have already stated well.<br>><br>> In fact, I have a feeling that we should put an effort behind foo:// patterns
<br>> as defacto standard for Drupal over [foo:] patterns.<br><br>Actually, for what it's worth, we should NOT use internal:// or *any*<br>foo:// patterns. Doing so, even internally, is a creation of what<br>appears to be a new protocol, even though it's actually not. We should
<br>instead create a new URN, such as internal:node/4. Apple, in the past<br>two years or so, I think, got flamed for using webcal:// for it's iCal<br>application, where webcal was merely a file format, and not a protocol.
<br><br>--<br>Morbus Iff ( take this ming! i'm sick of your dynasty! )<br>Technical: <a href="http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779">http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779</a><br>Culture: <a href="http://www.disobey.com/">http://www.disobey.com/
</a> and <a href="http://www.gamegrene.com/">http://www.gamegrene.com/</a><br>icq: 2927491 / aim: akaMorbus / yahoo: morbus_iff / <a href="http://jabber.org">jabber.org</a>: morbus<br></blockquote></div><br>