<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; "><BR><DIV><DIV>On 01 Sep 2006, at 2:41 PM, Dries Buytaert wrote:</DIV><BR class="Apple-interchange-newline"><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><P style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 10.0px"><FONT face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">does kubrick have a wordpress logo / brand ?</FONT></P> </BLOCKQUOTE><P style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px; font: 12.0px Helvetica; min-height: 14.0px"><BR></P> <P style="margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><FONT face="Helvetica" size="3" style="font: 12.0px Helvetica">Fair enough.<SPAN class="Apple-converted-space"> </SPAN>It's not a requirement, but it would be nice to have.</FONT></P> </BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>It's just that I see this as being Drupal's kubrick. IE: the standard theme<BR><DIV>you can keep running on your site, that is easily tweakable to make your own.</DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>I don't see sticking branding all over such a theme as a feature. I see it as a</DIV><DIV>drawback. </DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>The druplicon watermark was my biggest issue with marvin2k for instance.</DIV><DIV>No real site will keep the watermark there, and it just makes more work for the </DIV><DIV>average person running the site, to remove it. </DIV><DIV><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV>Witness the desire to make sites 'not look like drupal sites'. Ship a little 25x80 (or was it 20x85)</DIV><DIV>'powered by drupal' logo, in all themes, but don't make more work for designers.</DIV></BODY></HTML>