"Ya'll hear that, we're usin' code names!"<br>- Raising Arizona<br><br>Richard, please just go with a +1 or -1 for the idea. While "silly" isn't exactly a bad form of expression if everyone used their personal opinion it could get ugly.
<br><br>For the record, I'm +1 on code names. :)<br><br>Peace, love and bananas.<br>Trae<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/19/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Richard Archer</b> <<a href="mailto:drupal.org@juggernaut.com.au">
drupal.org@juggernaut.com.au</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">At 10:49 PM +0200 19/9/06, Derek Wright wrote:
<br><br>>i get the sense i'm in the minority thinking that this late binding<br>>is a) unnecessary and b) costly. however, if i can't win that<br>>battle, i'll wholeheartedly support using code names instead of the
<br>>terrible options we currently use ("cvs", "HEAD", etc).<br><br>Well, I'm right there with you.<br><br>Names for code are just plain silly.<br><br> ...R.<br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">
<br>-- <br> Trae McCombs || <a href="http://occy.net/">http://occy.net/</a><br> Founder - <a href="http://Themes.org">Themes.org</a> // <a href="http://Linux.com">Linux.com</a>