I understand the desire to have it look "Drupal"-y, I'm personally OK with having a link to <a href="http://Drupal.org">Drupal.org</a> via some sort of "Powered by Drupal" button.<br><br>I originaly thought perhaps it'd be ok to be in the Footer, but maybe we should keep said link/image "Above the fold" [Top immediately viewable half of the browser window] so people can see it.
<br><br>Trae<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/24/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Neil Drumm</b> <<a href="mailto:drumm@delocalizedham.com">drumm@delocalizedham.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Gerhard Killesreiter wrote:<br>> Trae McCombs wrote:<br>>> On 9/24/06, Boris Mann <<a href="mailto:boris@bryght.com">boris@bryght.com</a>> wrote:<br>>>><br>>> I am staying on target by making sure that an "ugly" theme doesn't
<br>>> make it<br>>> to be the default theme for Drupal 5.0.<br>><br>> Was it slated to be the default theme? I wouldn't want a default theme<br>> that doesn't show Druplicon on a prominent place.<br>
<br>I think that is okay to not have as a hard requirement. I think a better<br>statement on branding would be "It should look recognizable as Drupal,<br>once deployed on a bunch of new sites, for the sorts of people who
<br>notice such things."<br><br>(I've been able to recognize a few CMSes on arbitrary sites without<br>thinking about it for awhile now- I'm not sure if this is a good thing<br>or if I should close the laptop and go outside.)
<br><br>--<br>Neil Drumm<br><a href="http://delocalizedham.com/">http://delocalizedham.com/</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br> Trae McCombs || <a href="http://occy.net/">http://occy.net/</a><br> Founder -
<a href="http://Themes.org">Themes.org</a> // <a href="http://Linux.com">Linux.com</a>