<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/22/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Earnie Boyd</b> <<a href="mailto:earnie@users.sourceforge.net">earnie@users.sourceforge.net</a>> wrote:</span><br><div> </div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> Having two content types, even though identical in fields, provides more<br>> flexibility in workflow. For example, one can be moderated by default,<br>> and have comments on by default, the other can be not so.
<br>><br><br>But page and story have no difference as installed. So perhaps story<br>should be installed with no comments specified. If it were there would<br>at least be a difference between the two. Maybe even have the "Create
<br>a new revision" set for story.</blockquote><div><br>Lots of options. As stated, we can now programmatically set these things in default.profile. So we will.<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
> In 5.0, you can define your own type, or delete story if you don't like it.<br>><br><br>That is too obvious. I think page should be locked and not allowed to<br>be deleted so that the end user doesn't screw himself.
</blockquote><div><br>LOCKED is another value that is available. "So the end user doesn't screw himself" isn't connected to anything else. If I'm just using blogs and have no "pages", I'd want it deleted.
<br></div><br></div>In any case, I posted issue #'s earlier in the thread. I'll be hangin' out there.<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Boris Mann<br>Vancouver 778-896-2747<br>San Francisco 415-367-3595<br>Skype borismann
<br><a href="http://www.bryght.com">http://www.bryght.com</a>