<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Shouldn't have been drupal 5.1 named 5.0.1?<br>
<br>
I wouldn't like to start (again?) a (previous?) discussion, but, when
no number appears, anywhere in the world, in any field, a zero is
understood. Which means, drupal 5 could have been named 5.0.0.0.0.0.0.
This page it selfs (<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://drupal.org/node/93998">http://drupal.org/node/93998</a>) talks on a drupal
5.0 beta. The add project release form shows three fields for major,
minor and patch-level numbers. This 5.1 is a new patched drupal, right?
It should be 5.0.1, IMHO.<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<p><font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif" size="2">Robert
Garrigós</font></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>