On 7/10/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Gerhard Killesreiter</b> <<a href="mailto:gerhard@killesreiter.de">gerhard@killesreiter.de</a>> wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Tony Guntharp schrieb:<br>> Is there any reason why we're using APC and not eAccelerator or XCache?<br>> I've used all 3 in different production environment and APC has<br>> generally caused issues.<br><br>
When we initially set it up, eAccelerator seemed dead and XCache<br>probably wasn't around yet.<br><br>I'll raise the issue to try the others.<br></blockquote></div><br clear="all">eAccelerator is not dead. I use it on several sites and it works well. Performance
<br>is 13% better than APC, and it saves far more memory per Apache process than <br>APC as well.<br><br>Still some segfaults in certain combinations.<br>-- <br><a href="http://2bits.com">2bits.com</a><br><a href="http://2bits.com">
http://2bits.com</a><br>Drupal development, customization and consulting.