I guess I should clear things up by actually stating what I'd like to include. I wrote a module that is a simple wrapper for the Incutio XML-RPC Library (<a href="http://scripts.incutio.com/xmlrpc/">http://scripts.incutio.com/xmlrpc/
</a>), which is code. It's odd to me that it's licensed under the Artistic License, and in lieu of not hearing back from the author(s), I've decided to release it in the style of TinyMCE, telling users to go grab the library themselves.
<br><br>Jeff<br><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/10/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Earl Miles</b> <<a href="mailto:merlin@logrus.com">merlin@logrus.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Greg Knaddison - GVS wrote:<br>> On 9/9/07, Jeff Beeman <<a href="mailto:doogieb@gmail.com">doogieb@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>>> Does anyone see any reason why something licensed with the OSI Artistic<br>>> License
<br>>> (<a href="http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license.php">http://www.opensource.org/licenses/artistic-license.php</a>)<br>>> can't be distributed in a GPL'd Drupal module?<br>><br>> See also
<a href="http://drupal.org/node/66113">http://drupal.org/node/66113</a><br>><br>> "Why <a href="http://drupal.org">drupal.org</a> doesn't host GPL-"compatible" code"<br><br>I believe that applies to code, not art.
<br></blockquote></div><br>