On Nov 26, 2007 12:53 PM, Gerhard Killesreiter <<a href="mailto:gerhard@killesreiter.de">gerhard@killesreiter.de</a>> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>Hash: SHA1<br><br>Khalid Baheyeldin schrieb:<br><div class="Ih2E3d">> Well, I did some benchmarks, and they show that, out of the box at least,<br>> MySQL is faster.<br>><br>
> Here they are:<br>><br>> <a href="http://2bits.com/articles/benchmarking-postgresql-vs-mysql-performance-using-drupal-5x.html" target="_blank">http://2bits.com/articles/benchmarking-postgresql-vs-mysql-performance-using-drupal-5x.html
</a><br><br></div>> One benchmark was for a concurrency of 1:<br><br>> ab -n1 -c1000 <a href="http://mysql.example.com/" target="_blank">http://mysql.example.com/</a><br><br>This seems wrong in some way.<br><br><br>
Cheers,<br> Gerhard</blockquote></div><br>Thanks fixed the typo.<br><br>ab -c1 -n1000 ...<br>and <br>ab -c5 -n1000 ...<br>-- <br>Khalid M. Baheyeldin<br><a href="http://2bits.com">2bits.com</a><br><a href="http://2bits.com">
http://2bits.com</a><br>Drupal optimization, development, customization and consulting.