On Jan 15, 2008 7:23 PM, Karoly Negyesi <<a href="mailto:karoly@negyesi.net">karoly@negyesi.net</a>> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="Ih2E3d">> This discussion is pretty pointless. Dries has stated multiple times<br>> that he wants to increase the number of supported databases. So doing a<br>> Drupal release without full pgsql support is out of the question.
<br><br></div>And Dries has changed his mind about stuff more than once. He listens and can be convinced.<br><div class="Ih2E3d"></div></blockquote><div><br><br>It is nice to be idealistic, but it is practical to be realistic. Once can dream about many things, but the means to such dreams tell you what can be achieved.
<br><br>In this case, being database agnostic is the idealistic goal. The lack of manpower for it to happen for one database is obviously limiting that one database. So let us not talk about many more databases until we have the one in question addressed.
<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="Ih2E3d"><br>> So, I'd like to revert the idea: People who complain about postgres not
<br>> been tested and the release being late because of this should set up a<br>> postgres DB and test Drupal on it. Can't be that hard.<br><br></div>yeah but what about scratch your own itch? I have no business with postgresql .
<br><br></blockquote></div><br>Yes, turning the tables will not work on this one. Those who want it to happen must make it happen.<br><br>Where are those who have business with PostgreSQL/MSSQL/Oracle/...etc.<br>-- <br>Khalid M. Baheyeldin
<br><a href="http://2bits.com">2bits.com</a>, Inc.<br><a href="http://2bits.com">http://2bits.com</a><br>Drupal optimization, development, customization and consulting.