Yes, but with differentiation between InnoDB and MyISAM.<br><br>It already says Drupal sites are 94% Drupal, with 3% Postgres (and one vote for MS SQL and Oracle).<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Jan 15, 2008 6:25 PM, Michelle Cox <
<a href="mailto:mcox@charter.net">mcox@charter.net</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Something like <a href="http://groups.drupal.org/node/6164" target="_blank">
http://groups.drupal.org/node/6164</a> ?<br><font color="#888888"><br>Michelle<br></font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>On 1/15/2008 5:13:25 PM, Khalid Baheyeldin (<a href="mailto:kb@2bits.com">kb@2bits.com</a>) wrote:
<br>> I support chx's proposal, don't let PostgreSQL hinder the development<br>> cycle.<br>><br>> But, every time we have this discussion, we get people talking<br>> theories but no concrete data.<br>
><br>> We here about Drupal must be database agnostic, down with monoculture, ...<br>> etc. Which is all good.<br>><br>> What we are missing is how many real world websites use Drupal AND<br>> PostgreSQL, how big these sites are, how many contributed modules are
<br>> being used, ...etc.<br>><br>> I propose a poll with the following options on it:<br>><br>> - MySQL MyISAM<br>> - MySQL InnoDB<br>> - PostgreSQL<br>> - other<br>><br>> With comments enabled so we get at least some sampling of what is out
<br>> there.<br>><br>> Some data is better than no data, so let us get it.<br><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Khalid M. Baheyeldin<br><a href="http://2bits.com">2bits.com</a>, Inc.
<br><a href="http://2bits.com">http://2bits.com</a><br>Drupal optimization, development, customization and consulting.