<div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Ronald Ashri <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ronald@istos.it">ronald@istos.it</a>></span> wrote:<br><br>Agreed, absolutely. But these example content types should be constructed in the same way anyone would construct one, and there should be no magical behavior associated with any of their fields that are not associated with any others anyone might make.<br>
<br>Victor<br><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
victor: As for having default content types I think there are two
levels - Drupal as a system/framework should not assume anything but a
fresh installation should give a user(especially a new one that is
probably just exploring the system) some types to work with, even if it
is just a way to illustrate that different types that are possible. If
the first thing a new user has to do is actually create a content type
then we lost them right there...<br>
<br>
Best,<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
Ronald</font><div><div></div><div class="Wj3C7c"><br>
<br></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br>