That is assuming, of course, that the rest of core is not rewritten to utilize Views for lists of nodes. (/node, /rss.xml, and the other examples given previously in the thread.<br clear="all">-----<br>Cameron Eagans<br>Owner, Black Storms Studios, LLC<br>
<a href="http://www.blackstormsstudios.com">http://www.blackstormsstudios.com</a><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Earl Miles <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:merlin@logrus.com">merlin@logrus.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Chris Johnson wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Few of them, except node front page. Tracker would be second most<br>
common, probably, even though it's slow. I'll have to admit I use the<br>
blog module on my personal site.<br>
<br>
Any side effects of having Views in core, e.g. loading code not used?<br>
That's where my biggest concern would be now.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Very little of Views' code is loaded (obviously the .module file) is loaded if no view is ever invoked on the page. And I'm sure Views would remain a disable-able module.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>