Again, how can one person know that one line is useful to the entire community if other people don't speak up about it? It requires the community to be involved in the process and not reacting to just when there are problems.<br>
<br clear="all">Dave Reid<br><a href="mailto:dave@davereid.net">dave@davereid.net</a><br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Jeff Greenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jeff@ayendesigns.com">jeff@ayendesigns.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I don't know that I'd agree with the reason for denying it being valid. I'd say that with regards to the question posed earlier, it makes sense to approve a module that has 1 line of code, if that code is going to be use to the community. Denying the community the functionality, or telling several (dozens, hundreds, thousands?) of people to go code it themselves because it's trivial to do, but not trivial enough to add to core, doesn't seem like the right approach. If it's useful, a module makes sense.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>