It didn't sound like anything close to an insult to me.<div><br clear="all">--<br>Ryan LeTulle<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 3:53 PM, Domenic Santangelo <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:domenics@gmail.com">domenics@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Dec 31, 2009, at 1:29 PM, Nancy Wichmann wrote:<br>
> Domenic Santangelo wrote:<br>
>> Seems like overthinking/overengineering to me.<br>
><br>
> It was just a thought. There's no need to insult me. You could have stopped<br>
> with what I quoted.<br>
><br>
> Nancy E. Wichmann, PMP<br>
<br>
</div>Ouch. You should learn (sooner rather than later, imo) that criticism of an idea isn't the same as a personal insult. It's an odd reaction considering that I criticized my own solution as unscalable. I thought it was clear that I was saying that a solution such as yours would be more appropriate than mine in a very large-scale environment (which I didn't get the gist that the OP was working on), but perhaps it wasn't clear.<br>
<br>
As to overengineering in general, I think Drupal as a whole would be in a much better place if we called each other out on it more often (imagefield+imageapi+imagecache+upload+cck required for images in a node, anyone?). Food for thought.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-D<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>