<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html style="direction: ltr;">
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body style="direction: ltr;" bidimailui-charset-is-forced="true"
bidimailui-detected-decoding-type="latin-charset" bgcolor="#ffffff"
text="#000000">
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;">For my part, with
the source being a simple feed, separation would be good, or one
that is combined and one without sandbox entries. There are other
ways to split the sandbox entries out having received the feed,
but the bigger point is I received 21 items and all were sandbox,
so splitting them out doesn't help.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;">Additionally, I'd
love to see a Services service that allowed me to specify what I
want to get back.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;"><br>
</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt;">On 03/21/2011 05:47
PM, Chris Skene wrote:<br>
</p>
<blockquote
cite="mid:0C465032-004E-44AE-B018-B616449AFAC6@xtfer.com"
type="cite">Having sandboxes in a separate feed would be good,
however its still good to have them on d.o. There are some
interesting projects going up in sandboxes, and some are in better
condition that existing modules.
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Xtfer<br>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
<div>
<div>On 22/03/2011, at 8:18 AM, Shai Gluskin wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<blockquote type="cite">Scott,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Awesome. I love real data!</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Anybody know if we can have the sandbox modules
pulled out as a separate feed?</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Shai<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 5:08
PM, Scott Reynen <span dir="ltr"><<a
moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:scott@makedatamakesense.com">scott@makedatamakesense.com</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt
0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204,
204); padding-left: 1ex;">There's an issue for that:<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://drupal.org/node/1075206"
target="_blank">http://drupal.org/node/1075206</a><br>
<br>
I happen to be in the middle of researching these
numbers. Since sandboxes were opened, there have
been an average of about 31 sandbox modules and 7
full modules created per day. I don't have
historical numbers, but just quickly looking at
today's date last year, there were exactly 7 new
modules posted that day. So the rate of new full
modules doesn't seem to have gone up significantly.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Scott Reynen<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://MakeDataMakeSense.com">MakeDataMakeSense.com</a><br>
<br>
On 3/21/11 2:54 PM, <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:jeff@ayendesigns.com" target="_blank">jeff@ayendesigns.com</a>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt
0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204,
204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Hard to tell...the new module feed seems to be all
sandbox entries now :(<br>
<br>
On 03/21/2011 04:37 PM, Fred Jones wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt
0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204,
204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Is it just me or the past two weeks has there
really been a CRAZY<br>
amount of new modules being made? Even ignoring
all the "sandboxes"<br>
and "just testing" the real ones have been a
LOT. At least it seems<br>
so....<br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>