Well, yes, I certainly think the criteria for scores ludicrous and ultimately meaningless. I can't see there being much adoption of this module.<br><br>FWIW, though - regarding the text that reads "This module is currently in production", I take it to mean "this module is currently being developed" (the way a movie is 'in production' when it is being made/filmed) rather than "this module is production site ready"<br>
<br>Best,<br>William<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Fred Jones <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:fredthejonester@gmail.com">fredthejonester@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Can I ask a question? This new module<br>
<a href="http://drupal.org/sandbox/robertcfi/1104066" target="_blank">http://drupal.org/sandbox/robertcfi/1104066</a> says it's a sandbox, but<br>
it also says "This module is currently in production" in the text. My<br>
guess is that it will go nowhere (it is his first module also), but<br>
does anyone else think the criteria for scores are *ludicrous*?<br>
<br>
Since when is a site with more nodes and more modules and more users<br>
any "better" than a site with less?<br>
<br>
Should be obvious but a specialty site may be optimized and beautiful<br>
and in all ways built "perfectly" yet have a small user base and of<br>
course a small number of modules and nodes, yet far "better" than a<br>
big fat site slapped together with 1000 modules that serve only to<br>
SLOW it down.<br>
<br>
And also, since when does one have to know SEO to be a good developer?!??<br>
<br>
Perhaps this is offtopic. Sorry. :(<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
F<br>
</font><br>
PS: At least ranting made me feel better.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>