Answered in IRC, but not to leave this hanging:<br><br>In my opinion if they've done an appropriate review it's OK. If they have an application going right now (as some do) they're probably more familiar with the process than I am for example :-)Â I know of no formal rules about this. But as you are currently doing, I would pay attention to that factor.<br>
<br>Thanks,<br>-Randy<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Laura Scott <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pinglaura@gmail.com">pinglaura@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
One question: So far, I'm holding off on acting on RTBC set by members who are not git vetted users themselves. Do we have any policy on that? I am more comfortable acting on RTBCs from established community members. Any thoughts on this?<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Laura<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On Mar 30, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Randy Fay wrote:<br>
<br>
> Excellent - thanks for your reviews.<br>
><br>
> As far as I can tell, the role required to actually enable the "git vetted user" permission on <a href="http://drupal.org" target="_blank">drupal.org</a> is the "user administrator" permission, which is pretty wide-reaching and a bit hard to give out. That's why I asked for somebody who'd been around for a long time and had a well-established reputation - thanks, Laura!<br>
><br>
> I encourage you to keep reviewing, and others as well. Thanks so much! That's the key problem, especially since it's easier now to dispatch those RTBC's. Â (I just started work on enabling one myself, but found that I had to put the app back into Needs work. Oh well :-)<br>
><br>
> -Randy<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Lorin M Klugman <<a href="mailto:lorin@public-action.org">lorin@public-action.org</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Randy,<br>
> Thank you so much for your help processing the project applications.<br>
><br>
> Besides being one of the folks who are stuck at RTBC <a href="http://drupal.org/node/1074950" target="_blank">http://drupal.org/node/1074950</a>, Â I've already reviewed between 15-20 fellow applicants. I'd be willing to donate further time processing permissions also. Is there a formal application to process permissions? Or are folks simply chosen? Either case, I'd be happy to donate further time.<br>
><br>
> I also encourage folks to perform the reviews, specially the applicants themselves. I found myself learning quite a bit just by reviewing other applications and perusing what issue queue maintainers look for.<br>
><br>
> Thank you.<br>
> Lorin<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> On 03/30/2011 11:33 AM, Randy Fay wrote:<br>
> We have 1.25 people promoted to have privileges to help with the queue. Yay!<br>
><br>
> <a href="http://drupal.org/node/1110918" target="_blank">http://drupal.org/node/1110918</a> gave permissions that are needed to two more<br>
> people, so I think we can expect progress in coming days with final approval<br>
> on the RTBC-level applications.<br>
><br>
> Please note: We still need lots of help reviewing applications that haven't<br>
> gotten to RTBC. Would *you* be willing to take on one or two of these? If<br>
> so, read <a href="http://drupal.org/node/636570" target="_blank">http://drupal.org/node/636570</a> and get started. THANKS for your<br>
> help.<br>
><br>
> -Randy<br>
><br>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Sean Dague<<a href="mailto:sean@dague.net">sean@dague.net</a>> Â wrote:<br>
><br>
> My lending project, as well as 10 other projects, appear to be stalled in<br>
> the "Reviewed and Tested by the Community" state on <a href="http://drupal.org" target="_blank">drupal.org</a>. Â Most for<br>
> more than a week, one for over 2 weeks.<br>
> <a href="http://drupal.org/project/issues/projectapplications?text=&status=14&priorities=All&categories=All&component=All" target="_blank">http://drupal.org/project/issues/projectapplications?text=&status=14&priorities=All&categories=All&component=All</a><br>
><br>
> Again, I am new to the community, so perhaps just waiting is what folks do,<br>
> but that doesn't seem a very encouraging way to get new people involved.<br>
><br>
> Â From what I can glean from the trackers, the last things approved were at<br>
> the March 11th code review at Drupal con - <a href="http://drupal.org/node/1072660" target="_blank">http://drupal.org/node/1072660</a>.<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
><br>
> Â Â Â Â -Sean<br>
><br>
> --<br>
><br>
> Sean Dague            Learn about the Universe with the<br>
> sean at dague dot net      Mid-Hudson Astronomical Association<br>
> <a href="http://dague.net" target="_blank">http://dague.net</a> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â <a href="http://midhudsonastro.org" target="_blank">http://midhudsonastro.org</a><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
> --<br>
> Randy Fay<br>
> Drupal Module and Site Development<br>
> <a href="mailto:randy@randyfay.com">randy@randyfay.com</a><br>
> <a href="tel:%2B1%20%20970.462.7450">+1 970.462.7450</a><br>
><br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Randy Fay<br>Drupal Module and Site Development<br><a href="mailto:randy@randyfay.com">randy@randyfay.com</a><br>+1Â 970.462.7450<br><br>