<span style>We had the following spam posted as a comment (modified to eliminate bad words).</span><div style><br></div><div style><div><div class="content"></div><div><p>This height should be a beautiful place and the air must be really cool.</p></div>
<div><ul id="clean-url" class="install"></div><div><li>Video de femmes avec ... <a href="<a href="http://www.example.com/" target="_blank" style="color:rgb(17,85,204)">http://www.example.com</a>">bad site</a> en vidéo</li></div>
<div></ul></div><div></div></div><div><br></div><div><font color="#222222" face="arial, sans-serif">This is using some css in the standard Drupal css to </font><font color="#222222" face="arial, sans-serif">suppress the visibility of the bad stuff. Filtered html does not get rid of this. (We allow Filtered HTML in comments.) The result is that our spam checkers don't see the spam. Incidentally Mollom did not flag it either although the words in it, if in English, would probably have flagged it.</font><font color="#222222" face="arial, sans-serif"> </font></div>
<div><font color="#222222" face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font color="#222222" face="arial, sans-serif">The result is that the bad site gets credit in search engines for a link from another site and almost no one sees or clicks on the link. I think the cloaking is also forbidden by Google, for instance, and they may penalize our site.</font></div>
<div><font color="#222222" face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font color="#222222" face="arial, sans-serif">----</font></div><div><font color="#222222" face="arial, sans-serif">Walt Daniels</font></div></div>