Boo! :) I still think it's visually difficult. It feels... wrong somehow. Certainly, the sites are all managed in one directory tree, but then why bother with tree, why not just say Drupal directory? Or Drupal installation? When I said I'd never heard of it, I meant in the context of multi sites on Drupal. Why do you need tree, what does it make better, and why aren't you writing multi site documentation while you're at it? ;)
<br><br>Sorry to be picky! I'm just trying to understand. :)<br><br>Anisa.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/12/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Gary Feldman</b> <<a href="mailto:dpal_gaf_doc@marsdome.com">dpal_gaf_doc@marsdome.com
</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Anisa wrote:<br>> Hmmm...<br>><br>> Is there anything better?
<br>><br>> If codebase is a problem, in that say, it's technically wrong, then<br>> perhaps 'where drupal is installed' is just as good.<br>><br>> I've never heard installation tree, and it's not really tree like in
<br>> structure, since it suggests that the baby sites branch off the main<br>> site, whereas in reality, they often have nothing to do with each other.<br>It's a directory tree, not a site tree. Think of it as it might appear
<br>in the folder pane of the Windows Explorer:<br> drupal/<br> includes/<br> modules/<br> themes/<br><br>The directories form a tree, with Drupal at the root. It's fairly<br>common to describe a root directory with a set of subdirectories as a
<br>directory tree.<br><br>Gary<br><br>><br>> An image problem?<br>><br>> Anisa.<br>> starting to understand the code is gold proverb...<br>><br>> On 10/12/06, *Gary Feldman* < <a href="mailto:dpal_gaf_doc@marsdome.com">
dpal_gaf_doc@marsdome.com</a><br>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:dpal_gaf_doc@marsdome.com">dpal_gaf_doc@marsdome.com</a>>> wrote:<br>><br>> Anisa wrote:<br>> > Now that I have my own multisite (yay!), I started working on those
<br>> > multi site docs again. My rough drafts are here:<br>> Getting back to the "codebase" question, my preference is<br>> "installation<br>> tree." It's a concrete reference to the directory tree where
<br>> Drupal is<br>> installed.<br>><br>> The term "code base" connotes, in my mind, the original source code at<br>> the <a href="http://Drupal.org">Drupal.org</a> <<a href="http://Drupal.org">
http://Drupal.org</a>> site. It's a more abstract<br>> term, so that one might say<br>> "CivicSpace is built on the Drupal code base." See the Wikipedia<br>> entry<br>> (<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codebase">
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codebase</a>) for another example (and no, I<br>> didn't submit the Wikipedia entry).<br>><br>> Gary<br>><br>> --<br>> Pending work: <a href="http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/">
http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/</a><br>> List archives: <a href="http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/">http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/</a><br>><br>><br>><br>>
<br>> --<br>> *********************************<br>> <a href="http://www.AnimeCards.Org">www.AnimeCards.Org</a> <<a href="http://www.AnimeCards.Org">http://www.AnimeCards.Org</a>><br>><br>> 16,000 scans and counting!
<br>> *********************************<br>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>><br>> --<br>> Pending work: <a href="http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/">
http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/</a><br>> List archives: <a href="http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/">http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/</a><br><br><br>--<br>Pending work: <a href="http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/">
http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/</a><br>List archives: <a href="http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/">http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all">
<br>-- <br>*********************************<br><a href="http://www.AnimeCards.Org">www.AnimeCards.Org</a><br><br>16,000 scans and counting!<br>*********************************