<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/8/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Steven Peck</b> <<a href="mailto:sepeck@gmail.com">sepeck@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
The handbooks are a wiki for people with appropriate rights. There<br>are 98 of these people currently. <a href="http://drupal.org/node/109372">http://drupal.org/node/109372</a></blockquote><div><br>..... <br></div><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">I am not resistant to the idea of 'trusting the people', I have<br>experienced the reality of wide open edit access and the vandalism it
<br>resulted in and frankly have no desire to repeat it. It was a huge<br>time sink.</blockquote><div><br>This is what wikipedia is considering:<br><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20070808/tc_pcworld/135631">http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20070808/tc_pcworld/135631
</a><br> <br><br>Cheers,<br>Kieran</div></div><br>-- <br>To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.<br>