I agree with Meitar. I don't think having recently updated timestamps on out of date information is going to lull people into a false sense of security - at least not compared to now, where they appear pretty much timeless except for the version taxonomy.<br>
<br>This came up specifically in the case of module comparisons - if I see that a page comparing modules hasn't been updated for 6 months, then hopefully it'll indicate that things might have changed since then and encourage me to update it. At the moment, I have no idea either way unless I check the revisions tab (and I rarely do this unless I'm about to archive a page or make a big edit, hardly ever if I'm actually reading documentation).<br>
<br>Also, if I see a page that hasn't been updated since 2006 or something, then it's an extra bit of encouragement to jump in and fix it.<br><br>Nat<br>