Just had a skim.<br>
<br>
I would agree and say it's pretty well a policy not to credit yourself on
the pages (though I would keep the links to the other two pages if they
are useful as references). It does indeed discourage others from
updating the pages, and sort of clutters up the pages if a lot of
people have worked on them.<br>
<br>
If people want to know who's worked on pages, all they need to is look at the revisions tab.<br>
<br>
Otherwise, formatting and such looks pretty good.<br>
A.<br><br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Joshua Brauer <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:joshua@brauerranch.com">joshua@brauerranch.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word;">Um... OK so I didn't read this correctly... The PHP issue isn't what it looked like at first glance....<div><br></div><div><div class="im"><br><div>
<span style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Optima; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;"><div>
Thanks,</div><div>Josh</div><div><br></div><div>--</div><div>Follow me on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/jbrauer" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/jbrauer</a></div></span>
</div>
<br></div><div><div></div><div class="h5"><div><div>On Feb 1, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Joshua Brauer wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div style="word-wrap: break-word;">Any user with the permissions to post PHP code to your site has permissions much greater than 'administer content types'. In fact they can give themselves 'administer content types' permissions should they choose to.<div>
<br></div><div>I thought we had a policy against the credit links but maybe it's just been a discussion. In short, in my opinion, the credit links discourage others from editing pages as appropriate, clutter the page, and become a problem as to "at what point when I've edited the page should I remove those credit links from two years ago".</div>
<div><br><div>
<span style="border-collapse: separate; font-family: Optima; font-size: medium; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px;"><div>
Thanks,</div><div>Josh</div><div><br></div><div>--</div><div>Follow me on Twitter: <a href="http://twitter.com/jbrauer" target="_blank">http://twitter.com/jbrauer</a></div></span>
</div>
<br><div><div>On Feb 1, 2010, at 4:53 PM, Shai Gluskin wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite"><font face="arial, sans-serif"><span style="border-collapse: collapse;">A friend of mine (he's newish to Drupal, this is his first handbook page... go Laurance Rosenzweig @rosetwig) and I wrote a new handbook page for the Reference: snippets section called, "</span>Managing a CCK allowed values list without granting 'administer content types' access."</font><div>
<font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">It's at: <a href="http://drupal.org/node/701774" target="_blank">http://drupal.org/node/701774</a></font></div>
<div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">Three kinds of feedback would be appreciated:</font></div><div><ol><li><font face="arial, sans-serif">Tell me there is a much easier way (I'm dreading this one... hope that is NULL)</font></li>
<li><font face="arial, sans-serif">Review the handbook page and make improvements (it's directly editable by all d.o. users as are other handbook pages).</font></li><li><font face="arial, sans-serif">Give feedback on the "credits" at the end. Laurance in writing it up listed our names as creators of the tutorial. That's pretty rare on handbook pages, isn't it? I'm wondering if that is a part of d.o. culture that might be worth changing. I understand that handbook pages evolve with their wiki style. But the revisions list preserves that. And module pages often have "originally written by" lines in them even as the new maintainer identifies him/herself. What do you think.</font></li>
</ol><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">Best,</font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif"><br></font></div><div><font face="arial, sans-serif">Shai</font></div>
</div>
--<br>Pending work: <a href="http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/" target="_blank">http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/</a><br>List archives: <a href="http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/" target="_blank">http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/</a></blockquote>
</div><br></div></div></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div><br>--<br>
Pending work: <a href="http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/" target="_blank">http://drupal.org/project/issues/documentation/</a><br>
List archives: <a href="http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/" target="_blank">http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/documentation/</a><br></blockquote></div><br>