[support] URL changes in 4.7

[Mark Shropshire]

Thanks for letting me know Morbus. I didn't check first.

This still leaves the question. Which method are folks using..  
absolute or relative? Love to hear from a few Drupalers especially if  
they have made a decision based on this issue like I have. I have  
been doing absolute, now, but am thinking about going to relative and  
just not worrying about the images breaking.

Thanks,
Mark

On Jun 26, 2006, at 9:20 AM, Morbus Iff wrote:

>>> No if you add the xml:base attribute.
>> I recently discovered the same issue with RSS feeds in Drupal. If  
>> I don't use absolute links for images for instance, the images  
>> will not show up in the feeds. I would rather use relative links.  
>> If xml:base is the solution, then this is a fix that should be  
>> added to the core Drupal code which handles RSS for <front> and  
>> taxonomy.
>
> Psst, guess what? xml:base is *already* in Drupal's RSS feed. Very  
> few feed readers support it because feed readers think only about  
> RSS and Atom, and much less about XML or namespaces or hell, even  
> doctypes.
>
> -- 
> Morbus Iff ( sleep breeds sanity )
> Technical: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779
> Culture: http://www.disobey.com/ and http://www.gamegrene.com/
> icq: 2927491 / aim: akaMorbus / yahoo: morbus_iff / jabber.org: morbus
> -- 
> [ Drupal support list | http://lists.drupal.org/ ]