[support] permission problem

[Laura Scott]

On Sep 14, 2007, at 1:54 PM, Earnie Boyd wrote:

> Quoting Stefan Seefeld <seefeld at sympatico.ca>:
>
>> Metzler, David wrote:
>>> They don't need to be a full admin, but they do need administer  
>>> nodes
>>> privileges. I typically give this for site editors.
>>
>> OK. Are there any potentially dangerous side-effects in giving  
>> this sort of
>> previledge to all authorized users (as Laura seemed to allude to) ?
>>
>
> Yes.  If you want to control the users to a particular node type you
> can't.  Also allows the users to CRUD node types and puts
> administrative items in the menu.

You *can* give users permissions to edit their own nodes, though I'm  
not sure if they can see their own unpublished nodes. Getting their  
node published, though, is another wrinkle without administer nodes  
permissions. Perhaps a combination of a cck field and actions module?

Laura