[support] CCK - Content types with lots of fields

Metzler, David metzlerd at evergreen.edu
Thu Sep 27 19:37:27 UTC 2007


Depending on how the solutions are developed the back button may behave
differently.  Multi-part forms have this trouble in Drupal because they
use the "op" action to tell what page you're on.  Pageroute is likely to
behave better with the back button than some others.  I'd recommend
being careful to test back/forward button behaviors with these
solutions. 

Dave 

 

________________________________

From: support-bounces at drupal.org [mailto:support-bounces at drupal.org] On
Behalf Of Jeff Beeman
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2007 12:32 PM
To: support at drupal.org
Subject: Re: [support] CCK - Content types with lots of fields

 

Good to know - this is the kind of info I'm looking to gather.  Anyone
else know of any caveats?

Jeff

On 9/27/07, Yves Chedemois < yched.drupal at free.fr
<mailto:yched.drupal at free.fr> > wrote:

Also note that its been reported that sites with both many (like 40, 50 
?) cck fields *and* Views module can
result in high memory consumption. Still an open issue...

Bill Fitzgerald a ecrit le 27/09/2007 17:49:
> Hello, Jeff,
>
> Three options I'd look at, in this order: 
>
> http://drupal.org/project/cck_fieldgroup_tabs
>
> http://drupal.org/project/wizard -- this will need some development 
> attention, but would be an amazing module to have working cleanly
>
> http://drupal.org/project/pageroute -- this might not be your exact
use
> case, because this provides a path to create multiple nodes. 
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bill
>
> Jeff Beeman wrote:
>
>> Does anyone have any experience or comments on creating content types
>> with CCK that have lots of fields?  I am considering it's use in a 
>> project where content types would need 30, 40, maybe even 50 fields.
>>
>> If performance isn't an issue, what about UI?  Are there ways to
break
>> node submission into several pages?  The groups would be at least a 
>> good start for node submission, but it'd be nice in this case if it
>> were a little more "wizard"-ish.
>>
>> Jeff Beeman
>>
>
>
>

-- 
[ Drupal support list | http://lists.drupal.org/ ]

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.drupal.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20070927/9f984d76/attachment-0001.htm 


More information about the support mailing list