[support] FastCGI vs mod_php for Drupal
Keith Smith
techlists at phpcoderusa.com
Sun Jan 11 04:20:53 UTC 2015
Thank you to everyone who replied. I talked with a Drupal sys admin and
he told me to make three changes:
1) FastCGI
2) Up the memached cache to 96m
3) xcache.
I did not change to FastCGI. Only tried #2 and #3. On a vps with 2
cores and 4G RAM, page loads went from a minute to a second. I was very
impressed.
Thanks for everyone's feedback!!
On 2014-12-15 14:05, Jamie Booth wrote:
> My personal experience is that fast cgi is much faster I've used in
> fairly big traffic sites, even a Godaddy one which runs php as
> fastcgi. There are a number of items that you cant use with fastcgi
> which promotes it's speed. For example, you can't use "upload
> progress". Other items you cannot use also promote to it's potential
> speed gains depending on site-resource needs.
>
> _Jamie Booth_
>
> On 12/15/2014 01:34 PM, Keith Smith wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Any thoughts on FastCGI being less resource intensive than mod_php?
>>
>> Any reason not to use FastCGI on a server running a moderately large
>>
>> Drupal website with a decent amount of page views?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for any insight.
>>
>> Keith
--
Keith Smith
More information about the support
mailing list