<div>Well, I don't need to upgrade from Flexinode because I don't have that</div> <div>setup. What it did is let me create a new content type/node called Poem.</div> <div>So, before I can edit my poem node type, I need to figure out how to </div> <div>create the node.</div> <div> </div> <div>You mention the views module, is that a core module?</div> <div>Bruce<BR><BR><B><I>Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com></I></B> wrote:</div> <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid"><BR>Yes, CCK has the same "place in the ecosystem" as flexinode, but is a much more robust and extensible architecture. At this point it seems a foregone conclusion that CCK is/will be Drupal's node management system. Unfortunately, there is no good migration from flexinode to CCK that I'm aware of. There's a module that does a conversion in 4.7, but I have not used it and the description, when last I looked, described it
as somewhat shaky.<BR><BR>In Drupal 5, on Content > Content types you can configure any node type in the system. Simply edit your poem node type and set its default publishing settings to not published. You can then create a View using the Views module to list all poem nodes that have their published flag set to false, and only let admin users see it.<BR><BR>Cheers.<BR><BR>--Larry Garfield<BR><BR>On Mon, 28 May 2007 20:55:21 -0700 (PDT), Bruce Whealton <BRUCEWHEALTON@YAHOO.COM>wrote:<BR>> Hello all,<BR>> I had previously used Flexinode content on a Poetry Magazine<BR>> website using<BR>> Drupal 4.7.x Now, in Drupal 5.x it appears that Content Creation Kit<BR>> replaces<BR>> flexinode from previous versions, correct? Is the idea the same?<BR>> I had a menu link to Create Content >> Poems. I also had it setup<BR>> so that<BR>> what is submitted appears in the queue, whether it comes from a user<BR>> role of<BR>> Contributor,
authenticated user, or anonymous. If I give access for all<BR>> these roles<BR>> to Create Content, how can I be sure that it goes into the queue for<BR>> approval first,<BR>> instead of any user being able to publish directly?<BR>> Thanks,<BR>> Bruce<BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR>> <BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR>