<html><body><div style="color:#000; background-color:#fff; font-family:arial, helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12pt"><div><span>Indeed, Earnie, this is such a case. There are three main content types that are under control of OG. Only one of those types needs to be protected from snooping eyes (editing is a different story). But the existence of that group is well known, because they are the controlling group. The content needs </span><span><span>visibility </span>protection, but not the name of the group itself.<br></span></div><div> </div><div><font color="#ff007f" face="bookman old style, new york, times, serif" size="4"><i><b>Nancy</b></i></font><br></div><div><br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; margin-top: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"> <div style="font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div style="font-family: times new roman, new york, times, serif; font-size: 12pt;"> <div
dir="ltr"> <hr size="1"> <font face="Arial" size="2"> <b><span style="font-weight:bold;">From:</span></b> Earnie Boyd<br> </font> </div> <div class="y_msg_container"><br>
Warren, yes and no. Someone could want to advertise the private group<br>publicly while others would not want to do that. How would it<br>compromise privacy to advertise the group? Think about the user<br>registration option, there are three configuration options, it is the<br>same idea for a group. Maybe should be public, protected and private<br>where protected is visible by name but registration is by invitation.<br></div> </div> </div> </blockquote></div> </div></body></html>