<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">For a small, fixed, brochure site I'd
go with html.<br>
For a low budget blog site with no shopping cart, WP.<br>
For an easy to maintain mom & pop shop CMS, I would recommend
joomla though I haven't used it in a while.<br>
<br>
For a site with a secure shopping cart, multiple authors and
editors, or more complex setup then I'd recommend Drupal.<br>
<br>
I also think that Drupal is probably the most secure of all the
different platforms. I've been porting a customer from Drupal to
WP (because WP is easier to maintain donchya know) and I've been
kind of horrified at the WP code.<br>
<br>
On 3/18/2015 12:33 PM, Drupal wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:580CB9D4-4070-43A8-BF94-B76EBFDAEE84@afan.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi to all,
Actually, I'm not asking which CMS is better or something. I use Drupal for almost 6 years but, still, I would put myself to "higher beginner" level. 90% of my websites are small, simple, intro websites I built for friends and "clients". Mostly with News, Basic, Events/Calendar, Webform, Forum... content types. Pretty standard.
So, my question is "When is Drupal to big for a website?" When would WP fit better? Or even when would home-made-code fit better? Where is "the line" you step over and have to use Drupal? If a small nonprofit asks you to build small website with some basic stuff, for free if possible, would you still build it on Drupal?
Thanks for any input,
afan
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<br>
<div class="moz-signature">-- <br>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
<title></title>
-Don Pickerel-<br>
Fane Software<br>
<img alt="" src="cid:part1.03080006.02080307@fane.com"
height="70" width="66"><br>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>