Op donderdag 3 februari 2005 11:51, schreef Carl McDade:
> This paradigm is not condusive to bloat or anarchy in that the true
core
> [...]
> adjustments and increasing its size with extensions.
The success of the various unices (linux at the top) lies in the fact
that
small progams (anloge: modules) do one thing, but do it well.
Instead of that windows-environment where you need yet another Freeware
app to
do yet another task only to find out it does neraly the same as foobar,
with
that minor difference. I.e: there is not one single CD burner
application for
windows that does its job good and nothing more. you will find loads of
apps
that allow you rto rip, collect, and even play music.
So why should we need:
burner.module
burner-with-ripper.module
burner-withplayer.module
burner-with-oggplayer.module
when the best solution is to have burner.module, ripper.module,
player.module
ogg.module. And to make them work together?
Regards,
Bèr
That solution is fine as long as the core is player.module and burner
and ripper and ogg. There would be problems though if someone wanted to
extend player module in a manner that does not actually add function
but in reality changes player.module to something other than its
original capabilities.--
Untitled Document
Carl McDade
Information Technology Consult
www.carlmcdade.com
carlmcdade@gmail.com
Customer Relationship and E-commerce Technology Services for small
businesses
____________________________________________________________________________
kläppavägen 9a
82735 Ljusdal
Sweden
tel.0651-15805 telefax 0651-10875
Organisationsnummer: 590310-2050
VAT-nr. SE590310205001
Innehar F-Skattebevis
bankgiro: 5115 4433