I think it's exactly what a lot of people have been asking for in image.module for a long time -- definitely more useful for the majority of people than the gallery function. Like uploading, it can be turned off on a nodetype by nodetype basis, so nothing is *forced* on users, neh?
 
I'm curious whether it could be used by a module I'm working on -- a 'graphic novel' nodetype that would have 2 explicitly named images associated with it (one for the left page and one for the right page of a two-page spread).
 
--Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: James Gilliland [mailto:neclimdul@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 02, 2006 12:36 PM
To: development@drupal.org
Subject: Re: [development] nodeapi image concept (request for feedback)

I'd like to see it there

On 4/2/06, James Walker <walkah@walkah.net> wrote:
On 31-Mar-06, at 5:25 PM, Nedjo Rogers wrote:

> There's an issue on the image module for moving to nodeapi:
>
> http://drupal.org/node/43628

Yeah, after looking through the code, I'm inclined to say this makes
sense directly in image.module . Do others have a strong opinion?

--
James Walker :: http://walkah.net/ :: xmpp:walkah@walkah.net