You two related? :o)<br><br>Robin<br><br><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/14/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">James Walker</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:walkah@walkah.net">walkah@walkah.net</a>&gt; wrote:</span>On 12/14/05 9:34 AM, Robin Monks wrote:
<br>&gt; +1 for the sake of +1...<br>&gt;<br>&gt; What's wrong with nightly tarballs?<br><br>nothing when they're marked as such... but if someone claims to be<br>filing a bug against &quot;4.7-beta1&quot; how do you know *which* one they're
<br>talking about?<br>--<br>James Walker :: <a href="http://walkah.net/">http://walkah.net/</a> :: <a href="mailto:xmpp:walkah@walkah.net">xmpp:walkah@walkah.net</a><br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 12/14/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">
Tim Altman</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:web@timaltman.com">web@timaltman.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:34:40 +0100, Robin Monks &lt;<a href="mailto:devlinks@gmail.com">devlinks@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br><br>&gt; What's wrong with nightly tarballs?<br><br>Nothing, but they need to be marked as such.&nbsp;&nbsp;Calling nightly tarballs
<br>&quot;4.7.0 Beta 1&quot; doesn't work.<br><br>--<br>Tim Altman<br><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Robin Monks,<br>CSL Web Administrator<br><a href="mailto:robin@civicspacelabs.org">robin@civicspacelabs.org
</a>