Great idea!  Will be submitting my modules for review shortly :)  Are you reviewing Drupal 5.x or 6.x releases or both?

I noticed in the initial review that you also reviewed the .txt files that came with it.  I think it would be great if someone could also review the module documentation (hook_help, .txt files, online contrib docs) ensuring (a) that it exists and (b) is adequate and accurate - but this is probably a lot more work.  I don't even know where you find the time to do this!

One other idea, you could create a logo for modules to display on their project pages after they've been reviewed and have fixed all the issues.  Just a thought...

Anyway, well done!

Cheers,
Stella

On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Morbus Iff <morbus@disobey.com> wrote:

>From the mission statement:

"We all make mistakes; that's how we learn. Sometimes, though, we need someone to point out our mistakes, to sift through the chaos that is Drupal's contributions repository. Inspired by a comment on Morbus's code quality entry, chx and Morbus have taken up the task of giving some tough love to Drupal's greatest strength: the army of developers using its APIs. Want your own code publicly reviewed? Let us know!"

http://www.drupaltoughlove.com/

--
Morbus Iff ( est quaedam flere voluptas )
Technical: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/779
Enjoy: http://www.disobey.com/ and http://www.videounderbelly.com/
aim: akaMorbus / skype: morbusiff / icq: 2927491 / jabber.org: morbus