Hi Scott,
I don't think we are in contradiction here, but in point of view. I am saying that we should not encode what is an allowed character. If the URL is already present somewhere like (http://example.com/hj/hj) there is not need to encode and if it is present like (http://example.com%2f/test) there is no need to decode. And what you should do if you get such a URL, just do not touch it, because it contains no invalid character.
@URL dictionary: Are you kidding?? I was obviously referring to the same RFC.
I will like you to think for a moment and tell me what will you gain by breaking the URL into components and then encoding it and then joining it again. Consider this problem statement: You are given a URL, which is extracted from a source HTML of a webpage, and you need to access it using drupal_http_request(). I am, of course, interesting in improving what I currently have in hand.
"Fire me all you can, but cast me into a solid and beautiful pot"
--
Regards,
Nitin Kumar Gupta
http://publicmind.in/blog/
On Mar 13, 2010, at 8:20 PM, nitin gupta wrote:Technically, yes, but that's beside the point. Regardless of how strictly you choose to apply URL encoding, you should be applying it to specific URL parts, not full URLs.
I completely agree to what you and Scott are trying to say. But, I am not looking to create an URL, just to sanitize it to remove disallowed character, i.e. what a browser would do while accessing a URL when a user inputs an URL. Consider, I parse the following URL from XML:
http://example.com?test/com
Do you think I should encode the '/' in the query part i.e. [test/com]??
You're right that encoding the slash character isn't particularly important in the query. In a path segment, however, the difference between encoded and unencoded slashes is very significant; http://example.com/a/b/c is different than http://example.com/a%2fb/c. And a slash definitely shouldn't be encoded where it's used as a delimiter between URL components. This is actually a good example of why encoding must be applied to individual URL components, not the full URL.
I don't think we need to. (Nor will Firefox, if you enter this URL in the address bar).
What is the URL dictionary? Here's one of the relevant RFC on URLs:
If a URL contains characters which are allowed in the URL dictionary, will we ever need to encode those characters? No.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt
Selected quotes:
"A percent-encoding mechanism is used to represent a data octet _in_a_component_"
"the conflicting data must be percent-encoded _before_the_URI_is_formed_"
Emphasis added to, well, emphasize that encoding applies to component parts.
--
Scott Reynen
MakeDataMakeSense.com