On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:18 PM, Larry Garfield <larry@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
On Monday 19 May 2008, Darrel O'Pry wrote:
> I just think it wold be cool to support both options, as some items may beThere may be an advantage to that, but that's separate from what I'm
> user specific. I'm not excluding normal cache_set/cache_get. I'm still
> think in terms of a more general cacheable module_invoke_all and not
> specifically hook_*_info.
proposing. :-)
It sounds like most people are in favor of something like this, though. Is
anyone opposed to some written standards that we can then apply to code?