On 6/5/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Jim Li</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:jimmydami@gmail.com">jimmydami@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Hello, first off I apologize if this is inappropriate for this list. <br>
<br>
I just leaned that custom logging (by Kahlid) </blockquote><div><br>No, he did not do it. I did it. <br></div>&nbsp;<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
All these patches (at least the above 3 I mentioned) would be great to
have on my existing 5.x sites. But they are buried deep in the issue
queue or comment thread, thus easy to miss. My guess is most ppl aren&#39;t even aware of them unless they follow issue queue and dev list closely. Can we somehow organize them in a
central place, Group, Document page or even a Project? Does it make
sense and worth the efforts? Any comments? Thanks.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Maybe just a catcall project called &quot;backports&quot;. If not, then a taxonomy term, called<br>&quot;backports&quot; that these patches can go against?<br><br>This is of course with the appropriate disclaimers: &quot;use at your own risk, may kill your 
<br>unborn children, block upgrade paths, ...etc.&quot;<br>-- <br><a href="http://2bits.com">2bits.com</a><br><a href="http://2bits.com">http://2bits.com</a><br>Drupal development, customization and consulting.