I understand the desire to have it look &quot;Drupal&quot;-y, I'm personally OK with having a link to <a href="http://Drupal.org">Drupal.org</a> via some sort of &quot;Powered by Drupal&quot; button.<br><br>I originaly thought perhaps it'd be ok to be in the Footer, but maybe we should keep said link/image &quot;Above the fold&quot;&nbsp; [Top immediately viewable half of the browser window] so people can see it.
<br><br>Trae<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/24/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Neil Drumm</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:drumm@delocalizedham.com">drumm@delocalizedham.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Gerhard Killesreiter wrote:<br>&gt; Trae McCombs wrote:<br>&gt;&gt; On 9/24/06, Boris Mann &lt;<a href="mailto:boris@bryght.com">boris@bryght.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>&gt;&gt;&gt;<br>&gt;&gt; I am staying on target by making sure that an &quot;ugly&quot; theme doesn't
<br>&gt;&gt; make it<br>&gt;&gt; to be the default theme for Drupal 5.0.<br>&gt;<br>&gt; Was it slated to be the default theme? I wouldn't want a default theme<br>&gt; that doesn't show Druplicon on a prominent place.<br>
<br>I think that is okay to not have as a hard requirement. I think a better<br>statement on branding would be &quot;It should look recognizable as Drupal,<br>once deployed on a bunch of new sites, for the sorts of people who
<br>notice such things.&quot;<br><br>(I've been able to recognize a few CMSes on arbitrary sites without<br>thinking about it for awhile now- I'm not sure if this is a good thing<br>or if I should close the laptop and go outside.)
<br><br>--<br>Neil Drumm<br><a href="http://delocalizedham.com/">http://delocalizedham.com/</a><br></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Trae McCombs || <a href="http://occy.net/">http://occy.net/</a><br>&nbsp;&nbsp;Founder - 
<a href="http://Themes.org">Themes.org</a> // <a href="http://Linux.com">Linux.com</a>