In my view it is just demonstration of corporate nature of your
thinking. BTW, if somebody in the open community got power to veto
somebody out from doing something good, then how do you think it is
reflecting on image of this community as "open" one?
It is not the way to operate in the open community of developers.
If I have some different opinion on something like how vulnerabilities
have to be reported to community before they got fixed, it does not
mean that I can not help security team to fix it.
"Corporate nature" of Gerhard? You are so funny.
First, let me point out that "Drupal Developer" is not that good a name for sending emails to a community mailing list (that, or your mother was really angry when she named you). You are not applying to yourself the transparency principles that you are promoting.
Then, our community (and most other opensource communities) values action and contribution against anything else. That's why Gerhard speak has a lot of value here.
Damien Tournoud