I think this is a bit like flickr's approach: First(1) upload images,
and then(2) arrange it in a album (called &quot;set&quot; in flickr).<br>
<br>
I like that approach, but yet I haven't thought of a situation were I would prefer nodes before terms for the album part.<br>
<br>
/Anders<br>
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 23/08/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Adrian Rossouw</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:adrian@bryght.com">adrian@bryght.com</a>&gt; wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----<br>Hash: SHA1<br><br><br>On 23 Aug 2005, at 3:39 AM, Emiliano wrote:<br>&gt;<br>&gt; 1 - pictures are uploaded by image module and go to image galleries<br>&gt;<br>&gt; 2 - users must be able to create an album and insert (previously
<br>&gt; uploaded)<br>&gt; images into it *or* the users create an album and then upload<br>&gt; images to it<br>I don't understand..<br><br>Do the images get image nodes created for them ?<br><br>So you have two ways to upload images ?
<br><br>- --<br>Adrian Rossouw<br>Drupal developer and Bryght Guy<br><a href="http://drupal.org">http://drupal.org</a> | <a href="http://bryght.com">http://bryght.com</a><br><br><br>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>Version: GnuPG 
v1.2.4 (Darwin)<br><br>iD8DBQFDCtW9gegMqdGlkasRAgm9AKCZF9QVbu+P9zr0X+LDimO6Vsu7cwCePJpi<br>o0rMm4FX2VlXMb5TmFDy1n4=<br>=+3YB<br>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br></blockquote></div><br>